Freedom of Expression in Nigeria is not Absolute.

Abstract

This study will deal with the details of freedom of expression, its meaning, historical perspectives and restrictions. The paper will also include the study on right to freedom of press, including the role of censorship, defamation, concept of media trials, and the lack of conclusion of cases on fundamental rights breach allegation against the state at all levels in Nigeria, accompanied with all the relevant case laws.

The strength and importance of media in a democracy is well recognized. Section 39 provides for freedom of expression and Section 22; which is the mission statement in chapter two by federal government of Nigeria (being that a military government made the constitution for Nigeria, it couldn’t shake off that tango, and  promises made therein are now used by many for excuses to vilified the federal government and attribute any breach of Press Freedom to, even if committed by state government) in the Nigerian Constitution, both sections includes within its ambit, Freedom of Press. The existence of a free, independent and powerful media is the cornerstone of a democracy, especially of a highly mixed society like Nigeria. Media is not only a medium to express once feelings, opinions and views, but it is also responsible and instrumental for building opinions and views on various topics of state, regional, national and international agenda. The pivotal role of the media is its ability to mobilize the thinking process of millions.

Freedom of Press is undoubtedly one of the basic freedoms in a democratic society based on the Rule of law. Nonetheless freedom of expression is not an end in itself. The public function which belongs to the press makes it an obligation of honour to exercise this function with the fullest sense of responsibility.