Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): MAAUN International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Research and Innovations (MIMJRI)
Articles

Exploring the Potential: Encouraging Girls to Study Engineering Discipline (A case study of Borno State)

Published 07/14/2025

Keywords

  • Engineering,,
  • Discipline,,
  • Girls,,
  • Gender Gap,,
  • Academic Profession

How to Cite

Isah Muhammad, M., & Jibrin, H. (2025). Exploring the Potential: Encouraging Girls to Study Engineering Discipline (A case study of Borno State). Journal of Institute of Africa Higher Education Research and Innovation (IAHERI), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59479/jiaheri.v2i1.84

Abstract

Females are underrepresented in engineering cohorts in Nigeria. The underrepresentation of female participants in engineering fields has been a barrier for diversity and equality in both the industry and academic professions. This paper explores the underlying reasons for girls' hesitation to pursue engineering disciplines and discuss potential strategies to address these challenges. By promoting a supportive environment that encourages and empowers girls to engage in engineering education, we can work towards increasing female representation in this field and fostering a more diverse, innovative, and inclusive engineering workforce. The study found that some factors that influence girls under participation in engineering are Gender stereotype, quality of STEM education, lack of career guidance, self-efficacy, and lack of family supports. suggestion was made as follows: Challenging gender stereotypes, Improving the quality of STEM education in Borno State, building girls' self-efficacy in STEM, providing effective career guidance services, and promoting the visibility of female role models in engineering.

References

  1. Anderson,A.,andK.Gilbride.2007.Thefutureofengineering:Astudy of the gender bias. McGill Journal of Education 42 (1): 103–17
  2. Archer, L., Dewitt, J., Osborne, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). “Balancing acts”: elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967 – 989
  3. Betz, D.E., and Sekaquaptewa, D. (2012). My fair physicist? Feminine math and science role models demotivate young girls. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 738-746.
  4. Betz, N.E. (1994). Career counseling for women in the sciences and engineering. In W. Walsh & S. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling for women (pp. 237 – 261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. Bix, A. M., & Locks, A. M. (2018). Understanding the Underrepresentation of Women in Engineering: A Literature Review and Recommendations for Future Research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 429–439. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318794081](https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318794081).
  6. Chetcuti, D.A., & Kioko, B. (2012): Girls’ attitudes towards science in Kenya. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1571-1589
  7. Damour, L. 2009. Teaching girls to tinker. Education Week 29 (11): 25.
  8. Finken, D. A. 2004. On the brink. Community College Week 17 (6): 6– 9
  9. Fung, Y.H. (2002). A comparative study of primary and secondary school students' images of scientists. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 199-213
  10. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. American Association of University Women (AAUW). Available at [https://www.aauw.org/app/uploads/2020/03/why-so-few-women-in-stem.pdf](https://www.aauw.org/app/uploads/2020/03/why-so-few-women-in-stem.pdf)
  11. Holmegaard ,H.T., Madsen, L.M., & Ulriksen, L. (2012). To choose or not to choose science: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186-215.
  12. Leblebicioglu G., Metin, D., Yardimci, E., & Cetin, P.S. (2011). The effect of informal and formal interaction between scientists and children at a science camp on their images of scientists. Science Education International, 22(3), 158-174.
  13. Lent, R., Brown, S., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79 – 122
  14. MachineDesign.com. 2008, February 7. Encouraging girls to en- ter engineering. Available at http://machinedesign.com/article/ encouraging-girls-to-enter-engineering-0207.
  15. Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: a review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. Institute of Physics, London, UK
  16. Quimby, J. L., & DeSantis, A. M. (2006). The influence of role models on women's career choices. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(4), 297-306.
  17. Quock, D., K. Lauren-Kovitz, and M. Bhattacharyya. 2003. Argonne National Laboratory’s introduce a girl to engineering day. Proceedings from the WEPAN 2003 Conference, June 8, Chicago, IL.
  18. Rosser, S. V., and M. Z. Taylor. 2009. Why are we still worried about women in Science? Academe 95 (3): 7–10.
  19. Shaw, L. 2009. Women in non-traditional careers: Tools for suc- cess. Available at http://www.cccspecialpopulations.org/special populations WINTC web book.pdf.
  20. Slashinski, M. 2004. Girls Incorporated R !facts: Girls and science, math, and engineering. Available at http://www.girlsinc.org/.
  21. Stenmark, M. (2004). How to relate science and religion: A multidimensional model. Grand Rapids, MI/Cambridge, UK: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
  22. UNESCO. (2018). Girls' and Women's Education in STEM: Nigeria. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS).
  23. Wyer, M. (2003). Intending to stay: images of scientists, attitudes toward women, and gender as influences on persistence among science and engineering majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 1-16.
  24. Zirkel, S. (2002). Is there a place for me? Role models and academic identity among White students and students of color. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 357 – 376.